She is a lovely girl having nice back. I think when the lady ordered her to remove her trouser and panties and warned that she would be caned she definitely knew that she would get cane on her bare bottom. This type of caning, as I have learnt, was available in early Russia -- but mostly for boys. Naughty boys were ordered by father or elder relative like uncle or grandfather to remove his pants and lay down on a bench. Then canings were made on bare bottom. It was very painful. In my country, Sri Lanka, such bare bottom canings were available in early period -- also for boys. In schools we, boys had canings on our short-clad bottoms. They are painful. We were afraid to have canings on bottom.
返信
Here it is little bit of strange that the girl does not raise any objection or at least an appeal against lady's orders to remove her all cloths below the waist even in front of a male person. She may be intimidated by her offence. Kelly was having a nice watch on her nice big bottom. Even when Kelly comes down to the place as requested by the lady, the girl does not try to cover her private parts and bottom. While caning Kelly several times touches her bottom. Only after several such touches she raise some objection, which was strongly dismissed by the lady. I think the punishment is too much. After hard caning she should have been allowed to leave. But the lady ordered her to stay there whole afternoon with her waist down fully naked.
返信